Relationship modeling and anomaly detection based on video data

ABSTRACT

A method includes acquiring digital video data that portrays an interacting event, identifying a plurality of features in the digital video data, and analyzing the plurality of features to create a relationship graph. The relationship graph comprises a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges, each node of the plurality of nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals, and each edge of the plurality of edges extends between two nodes of the plurality of nodes, and the plurality of edges represents a plurality of interactions of the interacting event. The method further includes identifying an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge, creating an output representative of the anomalous edge, and outputting the output representative of the anomalous edge. The anomalous edge is identified by a computer-implemented machine learning model configured to identify anomalous edges in relationship graphs.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/286,844 filed Dec. 7, 2021 for “MACHINE LEARNING METHOD TO QUANTIFY PRESENT STATE-OF-MIND AND PREDICT FUTURE STATE-OF-MIND OF ONE OR MORE INDIVIDUALS BASED ON VIDEO IMAGES OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS” by M. Griffin, H. Kotvis, K. Lumb, K. Poulson, and J. Miner, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein; of U.S. Provisional Application 63/405,716 filed Sep. 12, 2022 for “RELATIONSHIP MODELING AND EVALUATION BASED ON VIDEO DATA” by M. Griffin, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein; of U.S. Provisional Application 63/405,719 filed Sep. 12, 2022 for “RELATIONSHIP MODELING AND ANOMALY DETECTION BASED ON VIDEO DATA” by M. Griffin, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein; of U.S. Provisional Application 63/405,721 filed Sep. 12, 2022 for “RELATIONSHIP MODELING AND KEY FEATURE DETECTION BASED ON VIDEO DATA” by M. Griffin, the disclosure of which is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein; and of U.S. Provisional Application 63/405,722 filed Sep. 12, 2022 for “RELATIONSHIP MODELING AND ADJUSTMENT BASED ON VIDEO DATA” by M. Griffin, the disclosure of which is also incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.

BACKGROUND

The present disclosure relates to relationship evaluation and, more particularly, systems and methods for automatically evaluating relationships using video data.

Individuals interact with others in social and professional contexts and can form relationships through those interactions. It can be difficult to evaluate the strength of the relationship between two or more individuals by observing the interactions between those individuals. Further, it is difficult to evaluate relationships among individuals in real-time, especially for individuals having impairments that decrease the ability of those individuals to interpret verbal and/or non-verbal information.

SUMMARY

An embodiment of a method according to the present disclosure includes acquiring digital video data that portrays an interacting event, identifying a plurality of features in the digital video data with a first computer-implemented machine learning model, and analyzing the plurality of features to create a relationship graph. The interacting event comprises a plurality of interactions between plurality of individuals, each feature of the plurality of features is associated with an interaction of the plurality of interactions, and each feature of the plurality of features is associated with at least one individual of the plurality of individuals. The relationship graph comprises a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges, each node of the plurality of nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals, and each edge of the plurality of edges extends between two nodes of the plurality of nodes, and the plurality of edges represents the plurality of interactions. The method further comprises identifying an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge, creating an output representative of the anomalous edge, and outputting the output representative of the anomalous edge. The anomalous edge is identified by a second computer-implemented machine learning model configured to identify anomalous edges in relationship graphs. The output representative of the anomalous edge is output by a user interface.

An embodiment of a system according to the present disclosure includes a camera device for acquiring digital video data, a processor, a user interface, and a memory. The memory is encoded with instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to acquire digital video data from the camera, identify a plurality of features in the digital video data with a first computer-implemented machine learning model, and analyze the plurality of features to create a relationship graph. The digital video data portrays an interacting event, the interacting event comprises a plurality of interactions between plurality of individuals, each feature of the plurality of features is associated with an interaction of the plurality of interactions, and each feature of the plurality of features is associated with at least one individual of the plurality of individuals. The relationship graph comprises a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges, each node of the plurality of nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals, and each edge of the plurality of edges extends between two nodes of the plurality of nodes, and the plurality of edges represents the plurality of interactions. The memory is further encoded with instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to identify an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge, create an output representative of the anomalous edge, and output the output representative of the anomalous edge. The anomalous edge is identified by a second computer-implemented machine learning model configured to identify anomalous edges in relationship graphs. The output representative of the anomalous edge is output by the user interface.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an example of a system for relationship evaluation.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an example of a plotted relationship graph that can be created by the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of another example of a plotted relationship graph that can be created by the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a further example of a plotted relationship graph that can be created by the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a further example of a plotted relationship graph that can be created by the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of creating relationship graphs and identifying anomalous edges performable by the system of FIG. 1 .

FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of analyzing audio data suitable for use with the method of FIG. 6 .

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of identifying anomalous edges suitable for use with the method of FIG. 6 .

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of another example of a method of identifying anomalous edges suitable for use with the method of FIG. 6 .

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of creating historical relationship graphs suitable for use with the methods of FIGS. 6, 8, and 9 .

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of performing supervised training of a computer-implemented machine learning model.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram of an example of a method of performing unsupervised training of computer-implemented machine learning model.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure relates to systems and methods for creating node and edge graphs describing relationships among a group of individuals based on video footage of those individuals interacting. The present disclose further relates to systems and methods for identifying outlier interactions based on the node and edge relationship graphs. Advantageously, the systems and methods disclosed herein allow for identification of unusual or unexpected interactions between members of a group that potentially signal negative changes in relationships between those individuals. As such, the systems and methods described herein allow for unexpected and potentially negative interpersonal interactions to be determined based only on video data. As will be explained in more detail subsequently, the systems and methods disclosed herein allow for anomalous interactions to be identified in an automatic manner, such that expertise at understanding body language, social dynamics, or other aspects of human interaction is not required to identify anomalous and potentially negative interactions.

The relationship graphs described herein describe relationships during a set of interactions of a group of individuals with significant more granularity than existing methods. Due to the granularity with which the relationship graphs described herein describe interactions between individuals, the granularity allows for outlier identification on an interaction-by-interaction basis and in an automated manner. In some examples, the relationship graphs described herein allow for individual actions to be identified as anomalous and unexpected, and recommendations or instructions for avoiding those interactions and/or actions in subsequent interactions can be generated automatically, allowing individuals unskilled in improving social interactions to more easily avoid interactions and/or actions identified by the systems and methods disclosed herein.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of relationship evaluator 100, which is a system for evaluating relationships of two or more individuals. Relationship evaluator 100 is configured to evaluate relationships by creating node and edge graphs representative of relationships among two or more individuals and identifying anomalous edges in those graphs. Relationship evaluator 100 includes processor 102, memory 104, and user interface 106, and is connected to camera devices 108A-N. Camera devices 108A-N capture video data 110A-N of individuals 112A-N. Memory 104 includes video processing module 120, feature extraction module 130, graphing module 140, and anomalous edge identification module 150. Memory 104 also stores relationship graph 200, which is an edge and node graph created by graphing module 140. Relationship graph 200 includes nodes 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, and 222. Each of nodes 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 are connected to another of nodes 202, 204, 206, 208, 210, 212, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 by at least one edge.

Processor 102 can execute software, applications, and/or programs stored on memory 104. Examples of processor 102 can include one or more of a processor, a microprocessor, a controller, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), or other equivalent discrete or integrated logic circuitry. Processor 102 can be entirely or partially mounted on one or more circuit boards.

Memory 104 is configured to store information and, in some examples, can be described as a computer-readable storage medium. Memory 104, in some examples, is described as computer-readable storage media. In some examples, a computer-readable storage medium can include a non-transitory medium. The term “non-transitory” can indicate that the storage medium is not embodied in a carrier wave or a propagated signal. In certain examples, a non-transitory storage medium can store data that can, over time, change (e.g., in RAM or cache). In some examples, memory 104 is a temporary memory. As used herein, a temporary memory refers to a memory having a primary purpose that is not long-term storage. Memory 104, in some examples, is described as volatile memory. As used herein, a volatile memory refers to a memory that that the memory does not maintain stored contents when power to the memory 104 is turned off. Examples of volatile memories can include random access memories (RAM), dynamic random access memories (DRAM), static random access memories (SRAM), and other forms of volatile memories. In some examples, the memory is used to store program instructions for execution by the processor. The memory, in one example, is used by software or applications running on relationship evaluator 100 (e.g., by a computer-implemented machine learning model or a data processing module) to temporarily store information during program execution.

Memory 104, in some examples, also includes one or more computer-readable storage media. Memory 104 can be configured to store larger amounts of information than volatile memory. Memory 104 can further be configured for long-term storage of information. In some examples, memory 104 includes non-volatile storage elements. Examples of such non-volatile storage elements can include, for example, magnetic hard discs, optical discs, floppy discs, flash memories, or forms of electrically programmable memories (EPROM) or electrically erasable and programmable (EEPROM) memories.

User interface 106 is an input and/or output device and enables an operator to control operation of relationship evaluator 100. For example, user interface 106 can be configured to receive inputs from an operator and/or provide outputs. User interface 106 can include one or more of a sound card, a video graphics card, a speaker, a display device (such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), a light emitting diode (LED) display, an organic light emitting diode (OLED) display, etc.), a touchscreen, a keyboard, a mouse, a joystick, or other type of device for facilitating input and/or output of information in a form understandable to users and/or machines.

Relationship evaluator 100 is configured to perform one or more methods described herein. Relationship evaluator 100 can accept data from and/or can be operably connected to an audiovisual data stream and/or an audiovisual data file. Relationship evaluator 100 can use data from an audiovisual data stream and/or an audiovisual data file to generate relationship graph and/or anomalous edge information. More generally, relationship evaluator 100 is configured to perform any of the functions attributed herein to a relationship evaluator, including receiving an output from any source referenced herein, detecting any condition or event referenced herein, and generating and providing data and information as referenced herein.

Relationship evaluator 100 can be a discrete assembly or be formed by one or more devices capable of individually or collectively implementing functionalities and generating and outputting data as discussed herein. In some examples, relationship evaluator 100 can be implemented as a plurality of discrete circuitry subassemblies. In some examples, relationship evaluator 100 can include or be implemented at least in part as a smartphone or tablet, among other options. In some examples, relationship evaluator 100 and/or user interface 106 of relationship evaluator 100 can include and/or be implemented as downloadable software in the form of a mobile application. The mobile application can be implemented on a computing device, such as a personal computer, tablet, or smartphone, among other suitable devices. Relationship evaluator 100 can be considered to form a single computing device even when distributed across multiple component devices.

Camera devices 108A-N are capable of capturing video data 110A-N of one or more individuals 112A-N. In the depicted example, camera devices 108A and 108N are depicted as capturing video data 110A and 110N of single individuals 112A and 112N. Camera device 108B is depicted as capturing video data 110B of two individuals 112B and 112C. Each camera device 108A-N captures video data 110A-N of one or more individuals 112A-N. Each camera device 108A-N is configured to be able to communicate with relationship evaluator 100 and relationship evaluator 100 is configured to communicate with each camera device 108A-N. Camera devices 108A-N can be, for example, a video camera, a webcam, or another suitable source for obtaining video data 110A-N. Camera devices 108A-N can be controlled by relationship evaluator 100 or by another suitable video device. Video data 110A-N are audiovisual data feeds portraying individuals 112A-N. Video data 110A-N can be stored to memory 104 for use with one or more methods described herein or can be stored to another storage media and recalled to memory 104 for use with one or more methods described herein.

Although FIG. 1 depicts only three camera devices 108A-N, relationship evaluator 100 can be operatively connected to any number of camera devices 108A-N. Each additional camera device 108A-N can capture video data 110A-N portraying one or more additional individuals 112A-N. Similarly, although each of video data 110A-N is depicted as portraying a single individual 112A-N, in other examples each of video data 110A-N can depict two or more individuals 112A-N. In some examples, relationship evaluator 100 includes only one camera that captures video data of all individuals 112A-N.

Individuals 112A-N are participating in an interacting event. As used herein, an “interacting event” refers to an event where the individuals 112A-N interact with each other through one or more interactions. The interacting event can be, for example, a meeting, a presentation, a sales pitch, a negotiation, or a conference, among other options. Each interaction that occurs during the interacting event is associated with at least two people. For each interaction, one individual performs an action toward at least one other individual, where the actions are selected and/or intended to have an effect on the other individual(s). Each action can include, for example, one or more words, one or more gestures, and/or one or more audible noises, among other options. For example, an individual can orally speak a statement (e.g., one or more sentences expressing an idea, thought, and/or concept) and physically perform one or more gestures to complement the spoken words of the statement. The statement can be directed at one or more other individuals. In some examples, the statement and the gestures accompanying the statement can be treated as a single interaction. Additionally and/or alternatively, the statement and the gestures accompanying can be treated as separate interactions. Where a statement includes multiple sub-statements that are linguistically separable, each sub-statement can also be treated as a separate interaction.

Video processing module 120 includes one or more programs for processing video data 110A-N. For example, video processing module 120 can include one or more programs for extracting image data, audio data, and semantic text data from video data 110A-N. As used herein, “image data” refers to the portion of video data 110A-N that is a series of still images, “audio data” refers to the sound data stored in video data 110A-N, and “semantic text data” refers to data that represents spoken words, phrases, sentences, and other sounds produced by the individual as readable text.

Feature extraction module 130 includes one or more programs for classifying the image data, audio data, and semantic text data extracted by video processing module 120. Feature extraction module 130 can include one or more programs for extracting classifiable features from the image data, audio data, and/or semantic text data. In some examples, feature extraction module 130 can include one or more computer-implemented machine learning models for extracting classifiable features from the image data, audio data, and/or semantic text data. The features extracted by feature extraction module 130 describe interactions captured by camera devices 108A-N.

Graphing module 140 includes one or more programs for transforming features extracted by feature extraction module 130 into a relationship graph. Each relationship graph created by graphing module 140 includes a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges. Each node of a relationship graph represents each of individuals 112A-N involved in a particular interacting event and each edge is representative of one or more features extracted by feature extraction module 130 from video data 110A-N of that interacting event. Graphing module 140 includes one or more programs for identifying individuals and creating nodes of a relationship graph. Similarly, graphing module 140 includes one or more programs for transforming features extracted by feature extraction module 130 into edges that connect the nodes of the relationship graph.

Processor 102 can use programs of graphing module 140 and information describing the identities of individuals 112A-N to create the nodes of the relationship graph. The identity information can be determined by, for example, analyzing data from video processing module 120 with one or more programs of feature extraction module 130 to identify features representative of identity. For example, graphing module 140 can also include one or more programs for identifying individuals 112A-N in video data 110A-N based on features extracted by feature extraction module 130. Graphing module 140 can further include one or more programs for associating features extracted by feature extraction module 130 with each of individuals 112A— N. An individual 112A-N can be identified by, for example, cross-referencing features with a table or array that relates features to identity. Additionally and/or alternatively, a machine learning model trained to identify an individual 112A-N based on a training set of features from image, audio, and/or semantic text data can be used to identify individuals 112A-N for creating nodes of the relationship graph. In examples where the individual 112A-N is identified, the nodes of the relationship graph can include, for example, descriptions of the name, title, or organizational position of the individual 112A-N, among other options. In other examples, descriptive identity information may not be available for one or more of individuals 112A-N. In these examples, the nodes of the relationship graph can include descriptions of the physical appearance, setting, built environment, or geographic location of the individual 112A-N, among other options. Feature extraction module 130 and/or graphing module 140 can include one or more programs for determining physical and/or environmental descriptions for each individual 112A-N represented as a node of the relationship graph.

Graphing module 140 can include one or more programs for creating an edge from each feature extracted by feature extraction module 130. Each feature extracted by feature extraction module 130 can be associated with at least one individual of individuals 112A-N captured in video data 110A-N by cameras 108A-N, such that each edge of the relationship graph can be associated with at least one node of the relationship graph. Graphing module 140 can also include one or more programs that, for each edge, are able to associate the edge with the nodes representative of the individuals associated with the feature represented by the edge. For example, for a feature that describes a statement (e.g., a feature that describes words spoken in the statement), can be associated with the speaker and/or the recipients of the statement. Processor 102 can use one or more programs of graphing module 140 to create an edge for each recipient of the statement and to associate those edges with the speaker, such that for each recipient of the statement, processor 102 creates an edge extending from the speaker to the recipient. In some examples, the features extracted by feature extraction module 130 are associated with all individuals involved in the interaction. Feature extraction module 130 and/or graphing module 140 can include one or more programs to automatically determine the individual that initiated an interaction described by the feature and further to determine individuals that were the intended recipients of that interaction. As will be described in more detail subsequently, the edges created using the programs of graphing module 140 can be directed or undirected and can also be weighted or unweighted.

Processor 102 can use programs of graphing module 140 to create a relationship graph for an interacting event by organizing the node and edge data for the interacting event. The relationship graphs created by graphing module 140 represent the relationships of individuals 112A-N as captured in video data 110A-N of an interacting event. Advantageously, organizing feature data extracted by feature extraction module 130 into the node and edge relationship graphs created by the programs of graphing module 140 significantly improves the ease with which patterns and data relationships can be identified within an extracted feature set for a particular interacting event. The relationship graph created by graphing module 140 can be represented as a table, a database, or a graphical image, among other options. In some examples, all edges extending between two nodes are combined into a single, weighted edge in the relationship graph data. In other examples, each edge is stored separately in the relationship graph. In some of these examples, the relationship graph also stores descriptions of the features corresponding to each edge, allowing analysis for the presence and/or absence of particular interactions during the interacting event represented by the relationship graph.

Anomalous edge identification module 150 includes one or more programs for identifying edges of relationship graphs produced using graphing module 140 as anomalous edges. Anomalous edges are edges of a node and edge relationship graph that are not typically present or are unexpected in a relationship graph of a particular kind of interacting event and/or of an interacting event of a particular group of individuals. In some examples, an anomalous edge can be associated with one or more interactions that result in a negative outcome of an interacting event.

The programs of anomalous edge identification module 150 can use historical relationship graph information to identify anomalous edges in a relationship graph created from video footage of a more recent and/or current interacting event. The historical relationship graph information can be produced by creating relationship graphs from footage of prior interacting events with the programs of video processing module 120, feature extraction module 130, and graphing module 140. For example, footage can be collected over multiple instances of a recurring meeting or event. The footage for each event can be processed by relationship evaluator 100 to create relationship graphs that can be used as historical relationship graphs by anomalous edge identification module 150.

Anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more computer-implemented machine learning models trained to detect anomalies in a relationship graph generated by graphing module 140 based on historical relationship graph information. The one or more computer-implemented machine learning models can include, for example, a nearest-neighbor model (e.g., a k-nearest neighbor algorithm), a clustering-based model (e.g., a local outlier factor algorithm), a support vector machine model, and/or an artificial neural network model, among other options. In some examples, the computer-implemented machine learning model(s) can be trained to detect outliers using data other than the historical graph data. For example, for some anomaly and/or outlier detection methods, it may be suitable to train a machine learning model to detect outliers on a generic dataset. In other examples, the computer-implemented machine learning model(s) can be trained to detect outliers by using the historical graph data as training data. For example, it may be advantageous to train an artificial neural network to detect outliers in relationship graphs by using the historical graph data as training data. In some examples, supervised learning with labeled training data can be used to train the computer-implemented machine learning model(s). In other examples, unsupervised learning with unlabeled training data can be used to train the computer-implemented machine learning model(s).

Anomalous edges detected using anomalous edge identification module 150 may indicate a beneficial change in interpersonal relations among the members of the group. For example, the unexpected edge may represent one or more additional positive interactions between members of a group, indicating an improved relationship between those group members. However, in some examples, new edges may be associated with negative event outcomes. For example, if a new edge is representative of positive interactions between two group members, the improved relationship between group members may lead to decreased productivity and/or distractions that result in a negative outcome of the interacting event as compared to historical instances of the interacting event. As a further example, a new edge may be representative of negative interactions between a pair of group members, suggesting a potential increase in conflict among the group members connected by the anomalous edge.

When an anomalous edge is identified in a relationship graph, one or more programs of anomalous edge identification module 150 can be used to create an output representative of the anomalous edge. The output can be, for example, an indication of the edge, such as an indication of individual(s) associated with the edge, or action(s) or feature(s) represented by the edge. One or more individuals of the group or an individual in a managerial position relative to the group can use the output to determine whether anomalous edge represents a positive or negative development in interpersonal relations among the group. The indication of the anomalous edge can be output as alphanumeric characters representing the individual and/or the action(s) or feature(s) associated with the edge.

In some examples where the presence of an anomalous edge is associated with a negative event outcome, anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more programs for outputting an adjustment recommendation for reducing the likelihood that the anomalous edge appears in subsequent relationship graphs of subsequent interacting events. The adjustment recommendation can be one or more actions that can be performed during a subsequent interacting event and/or prior to a subsequent interacting event to reduce the likelihood that the anomalous edge appears in a subsequent relationship graph. For example, the adjustment recommendation can be an instruction to one of the individuals connected by the anomalous edge to perform or refrain from performing one or more actions. The adjustment recommendation can also be an instruction to another member of a group including the individuals connected by the anomalous edge to disrupt the interaction represented by the anomalous edge. As a further example, the adjustment recommendation can be an instruction to an individual in a managerial role to take one or more actions to members of the group before a subsequent interacting event. The actions can be, for example, talking or providing another intervention to the individuals connected by the anomalous edge. Memory 104 can store a table, array, and/or database that associates adjustment recommendations with features and/or action represented by edges, and processor 102 can cross-reference the table, array, and/or database to determine an adjustment recommendation associated with reducing the likelihood that the anomalous edge appears on a subsequent graph of a subsequent interacting event between the members of the group.

Memory 104 can also include one or more programs for recognizing an interacting event. Each relationship graph generated by graphing module 140 describes one interacting event. However, in some examples video data 110A-N can include footage of more than one interacting event (e.g., footage of two consecutive interacting events). Memory 104 can include one or more programs for recognizing interacting events in a continuous video recording of multiple interacting events and for isolating the video data for each event. The video data for each event can then be processed using video processing module 120, feature extraction module 130, graphing module 140, and anomalous edge identification module 150.

Relationship graph 200 is one example of a relationship graph that can be created by graphing module 140. Relationship graph 200 can be stored to memory 104 and anomalous edges within relationship graph 200 can be identified by anomalous edge identification module 150. Relationship graph 200 includes nodes 202-222, which are connected by various edges. Node 202 is connected to nodes 204, 206, and 208. Node 204 is connected to nodes 202, 208, and 210. Node 206 is connected to nodes 202, 210, and 212. Node 208 is connected to nodes 202, 204, and 210. Node 210 is connected to nodes 204 and 206. Node 212 is connected to nodes 206, 210, 214, and 216. Node 214 is connected to nodes 212, 216, and 218. Node 216 is connected to nodes 212, 214, 218, and 220. Node 218 is connected to nodes 214, 216, 220, and 222. Node 220 is connected to nodes 216, 218, and 222. Node 222 is connected to nodes 218 and 220. Relationship graph 200 is a visual, plotted depiction of relationship graph information. The information depicted in relationship graph 200 can be stored in other manners (e.g., as a table, array, or database). The plotted depictions of relationship graphs herein are not limiting and are included for explanatory purposes.

The nodes of relationship graph 200 are arranged into two sub-groups. Specifically, nodes 202-210 form one subgroup that is linked to a second subgroup of nodes 214-222 by node 212. If, for example, relationship graph 200 described a meeting of workers in a hierarchically-arranged office environment, the arrangement of workers within the office hierarchy can be inferred from the from the distribution of nodes 202-222 and the edges interconnecting nodes 202-222. For example, it can be inferred that the individuals represented by nodes 206, 210, 216, and 214 are in a middle-management role between the individual represented by node 212, who likely has elevated managerial and/or decision-making duties, and the individuals represented by nodes 202, 204, 207, 218, 220, and 222, who likely are low-level workers with few or no managerial responsibilities.

Further, one of individuals represented by nodes 200-222 or an individual interacting with the individuals represented by nodes 200-222 can inspect relationship graph 200 to understand the relationship dynamics among the group of individuals represented by nodes 200-222. For example, if a salesperson is making a sales pitch to the individuals represented by nodes 200-222, the salesperson could inspect relationship graph 200 to identify the individual represented by node 212 as an individual with decision-making authority, and the salesperson could tailor their sales pitch toward the individual represented by node 212. As a further example, relationship graph 200 could be used by the individuals represented by nodes 200-212 to understand the effectiveness of their organizational hierarchy or management structure. As described with respect to the previous example, the structure of relationship graph 200 implies that the individual represented by node 212 has the highest position in an organizational hierarchy among the individuals represented by nodes 200-222. If, however, the individual represented by node 222 is designated as having highest position in the organizational hierarchy, the structure of relationship graph 200 implies that, despite their designation, the individual represented by node 222 is not who the other individuals represented by nodes 200-220 look to for leadership and/or management. In this example, the structure of relationship graph implies one or more defects in the organizational structure and/or in the managerial capabilities of the individual represented by node 222.

In some examples, nodes 200-222 can be labeled according to the role of the individual represented by the node in an organizational hierarchy, and the labels can be used also be used by anomalous edge identification module 150 to identify anomalous edges within relationship graph 200. For example, if node 212 is labeled as the highest-ranking role and node 222 is labeled as the lowest-ranking role in an organizational hierarchy, an additional edge between nodes 212 and 222 may be unusual or anomalous while an additional edge between node 212 and a node labeled as a middle-ranking role may not be unusual. In some examples the identify of each node (e.g., the name of the person represented by the node) can also be used to help identify anomalous edges. A user can input labels for each node to a user interface, such as user interface 106, for use with identifying anomalous edges.

Relationship graph 200, including nodes 200-222 and the depicted arrangement of nodes 200-222, is a non-limiting example and is provided for explanatory purposes. In other examples, relationship graph 200 could have a different quantity of nodes and/or the nodes of relationship graph could have a different arrangement (i.e., by having a different set of edges). Similarly, the programs stored on memory 104 (e.g., those of video processing module 120, feature extraction module 130, graphing module 140, and anomalous edge identification module 150) can be used to create and evaluate other relationship graphs.

FIGS. 2-5 are schematic depictions of other examples of plotted relationship graphs that can be produced using graphing module 140 and used as inputs by anomalous edge identification module 150. Like relationship graph 200, the relationship graphs depicted in FIGS. 2-5 are shown as plotted graphs. Each of FIGS. 2-5 depicts the same four individuals as nodes 272, 274, 276, 278. However, each of FIGS. 2-5 depicts an alternative arrangement and/or type of edges describing the interactions of an interacting event between the individuals represented by nodes 272-278.

FIG. 2 is a schematic depiction of relationship graph 270, which includes nodes 272-278 and edges 282-298. Relationship graph 270 is a weighted, directed graph, such that each of edges 282-298 has a direction (indicated by an arrowhead) and a weight. In FIG. 2 , each of edges 282-298 has a thickness T that is representative of the weight of the edge. Each of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 are connected to each other of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 by at least one of edges 282-298. Edge 282 extends from node 272 to node 274, edge 284 extends from node 274 to node 272, edge 286 extends from node 276 to node 274, edge 288 extends from node 278 to node 272, edge 292 extends from node 274 to node 276, edge 294 extends from node 276 to node 274, edge 296 extends from node 278 to node 274, and edge 298 extends from node 278 to node 276. The direction of edges 282-298 can convey the direction of interactions between the individuals represented by nodes 272-278, among other options. For example, edge 282 can represent interactions initiated by the individual represented by node 272 and directed toward the individual represented by node 274. Similarly, edge 284 can represent interactions initiated by the individual represented by node 274 and directed toward the individual represented by node 272. As is indicated by the relative thicknesses of edges 282 and 284 (indicative of the weight of edges 282 and 284), the individual represented by node 274 initiated significantly more interactions that were directed toward the individual represented by node 272 than the individual represented by node 272 initiated in the reverse direction (i.e., toward the individual represented by node 274). Further, as is indicated by the direction of edges 292, 294, and 296, the individual represented by node 274 did not initiate interactions with the individual represented by node 278 but did initiate interactions with the individual represented by node 276. The weights of edges 292 and 284 indicate that the individual represented by node 274 initiated significantly more interactions with the individual represented by node 272 than the individual represented by node 276. Whether an individual is an initiator and/or recipient of an interaction can be determined based on the features extracted by feature extraction module 130. Other aspects of the relationships of the individuals represented by nodes 272-278 not discussed herein can be determined based on the directions and weights of edges 282-298.

FIG. 3 is a schematic depiction of relationship graph 370, which is another example of a relationship graph that can be produced using graphing module 140. Relationship graph 370 includes nodes 272-278 connected by edges 384-398. Relationship graph 370 is a weighted and undirected graph, such that each of edges 384-398 has a weight, but unlike edges 282-298, edges 384-398 do not have orientations or directions. Like edges 282-298 (FIG. 2 ), each of edges 384-398 has a thickness that is representative of the weight of the edge. In FIG. 3 , each of nodes 272, 274,276,278 are connected to each other of nodes 272,274,276,278 by at least one of edges 384-398. Edge 384 extends between nodes 272 and 274, edge 386 extends between nodes 272 and 276, edge 388 extends between node 272 and node 278, edge 392 extends between nodes 274 and 276, edge 396 extends between nodes 274 and 278, and edge 398 extends between nodes 276 and 278. As edges 384-398 are unweighted, relationship graph 370 does not store information related to which individual(s) of those represented by nodes 272-278 initiated interactions and/or which individual(s) were the intended recipients of those interactions. Unweighted edges can be advantageous to describe interactions that do not have a clear initiator and/or recipient. For example, if two individuals make incidental eye contact during an interacting event, the eye contact may be a useful interaction for describing the relationship among those members of the group, but it may be difficult to discern who initiated the incidental eye contact. Relationship graph 370 condenses the quantity and/or quality of interactions between each individual into a single, weighted edge. Accordingly, relationship graph 370 conveys the overall strength of connection between the individuals represented by nodes 272-278. For the depicted example, the connection between the individuals represented by nodes 272 and 274 and the connection between the individuals represented by nodes 272 and 276 are stronger than the connections between other combinations of individuals.

FIG. 4 is a schematic depiction of relationship graph 470, which a further example of a relationship graph that can be produced using graphing module 140. Relationship graph 470 includes nodes 272-278 connected by edges 484-498. Relationship graph 470 is a weighted graph, such that each of edges 384-398 has a weight. Unlike relationship graphs 270 and 370 (FIGS. 2-3 ), however, relationship graph 470 includes a mixture of undirected and directed edges. Relationship graph 470, accordingly, is able to store information relating to features extracted from interactions that have a discernable initiator and/or recipient and interactions that do not have a clear initiator and/or recipient. In FIG. 4 , each of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 are connected to each other of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 by at least one of edges 484-498. Edge 484 is undirected and extends between nodes 272 and 274, edge 486 is directed and extends from node 276 to node 278, edge 488 is undirected and extends between nodes 272 and 278, edge 492 is directed and extends from node 274 to node 276, edge 494 is directed extends from node 276 to node 274, edge 496 is undirected and extends between nodes 274 and 278, and edge 498 is directed and extends from node 278 to node 276. Edges 486, 492, and 494 are directed and, accordingly, store initiator and/or recipient information. Edges 484, 488, and 496 are unweighted and do not store initiator and/or recipient information.

The edges of the plotted depictions of relationship graphs 270, 370, and 470 in FIGS. 2-4 are weighted and can represent a combination of multiple interactions. Using relationship graph 470 (FIG. 4 ) as an example, edge 486 may represent a single, weighted value reflective of all interactions initiated by the individual represented by node 276 and directed to the individual represented by node 272. Combining edges allows each edge to be representative the overall connection between the individuals represented by the nodes connected by the edge. No more than two directed edges or one undirected edge extends between any pair of nodes 272-278 in relationship graphs 270, 370, and 470 (FIGS. 2-4 , respectively). In other examples, it may be advantageous to combine interactions into multiple groups of interactions (e.g., by type of category of interaction) and/or to not combine some or all interactions, such that the relationship graph is a multigraph and multiple edges extend between certain pairs of nodes 272-278.

FIG. 5 is a schematic depiction of relationship graph 570, which is a further example of a relationship graph of an interacting event. Relationship graph 570 includes nodes 272-278 connected by edges 584-599. Relationship graph 570 is a multigraph, such that multiple edges extend between certain pairs of nodes 272-278. Accordingly, different edges extending between the same pair of nodes 272-278 can correspond to different interactions and/or different groups of interactions. Like relationship graph 470 (FIG. 4 ), relationship graph 570 includes a mixture of undirected and directed edges. Relationship graph 570, accordingly, is able to store information relating to features from interactions that have a discernable initiator and/or recipient and interactions that do not have a clear initiator and/or recipient. For clarity and explanatory purposes, relationship graph 570 is not depicted as a weighted graph, but in other examples a relationship graph created by graphing module 140 can be a multigraph that includes weighted edges. Similarly, while relationship graph 570 is a multigraph that includes a combination of directed and undirected edges, graphing module 140 can also be configured to create multigraphs including only directed edges as well as multigraphs including only undirected edges.

In FIG. 5 , each of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 are connected to each other of nodes 272, 274, 276, 278 by at least one of edges 584-599. Edge 584 is undirected and extends between nodes 272 and 274, edge 586 is directed and extends from node 276 to node 272, edge 588 is undirected and extends between nodes 272 and 278, edge 592 is directed and extends from node 274 to node 276, edge 594 is directed and extends from node 276 to node 274, edges 595 and 596 are undirected and extend between nodes 274 and 278, edges 597 and 598 are undirected and extend between nodes 276 and 287, and edge 599 is directed and extends from node 278 to node 276.

As depicted in FIG. 5 , a combination of directed and undirected edges can also extend between pairs of nodes of a relationship graph. Using edges 597-599 as examples, edges 597 and 598 may represent one or more interactions or features of an interaction where there was not a clear initiator and/or recipient. Conversely, edge 599 represents one or more interactions or features of an interaction initiated by the individual represented by node 278 and directed toward the individual represented by node 276. The edges of relationship graph 570 are arranged for explanatory purposes and in other examples, other arrangements of undirected and/or directed edges between different arrangements and/or quantities of nodes are possible.

In FIGS. 2, 3, and 4 , edge weight is depicted by line thickness. Line thickness is only one example of a method of conveying a numeric edge weight value, and in other examples edge weight can be conveyed or denoted in a different manner on a plotted graph. For example, one or more numerals describing the weight of the edge placed adjacent to the edge can be used to convey weight in a plotted graph.

The relationship graphs shown in FIGS. 1-5 are plotted diagrams having drawn nodes and drawn edges connecting nodes. In examples where graphing module 140 produces a plotted depiction of a relationship graph, anomalous edge identification module 150 can identify anomalous edges from a plotted graph. For example, a plotted graph can be stored as an image to memory 104 and an image hash can be created from the image. Anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more programs for identifying anomalous edges based on image hash data, such as one or more machine learning models trained to identify anomalous edges based on image hash data. In other examples, the relationship graphs produced by graphing module 140 are represented by text and/or numeric data and anomalous edge identification module 150 is able to identify anomalous edges based on the text and/or numeric data. For example, the relationship graph created by graphing module 140 can be one or more tables or arrays describing the nodes and edges of the graph. As a specific example, the relationship graph can be a node table describing the nodes of the graph (e.g., by describing the identities or individuals the nodes correspond to) and an edge table describing the edges of the graph (e.g., by describing the feature(s) represented by the edge and the connectivity of the edge). All features represented by the plotted diagrams shown in FIGS. 1-5 , such as edge weights or directed/undirected edge information, can be stored in as part of tabular node and edge data. Text and/or numeric data representing a relationship graph can be stored as a table, an array, and/or a database to memory 104 or another suitable storage device, including one or more physical and/or virtual storage devices, for use by anomalous edge identification module 150. In these examples, anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more programs for identifying anomalous edges represented in tabular, arrayed, and/or database formats, such as one or more trained machine learning models.

As will be explained in more detail subsequently, the relationship graphs described herein provide a flexible solution for modeling relationship dynamics within a group of individuals. The relationship graphs described herein can be constructed passively based on video data of members of the group. The use of video data, and in some examples a combination of image, audio, and semantic text data derived from the video data, allows for improved understanding of the quality of interpersonal interactions as compared to existing methods. For example, two individuals in a group may have a large number of sarcastic interactions suggestive of a negative relationship between those two individuals. An existing method may incorrectly assume that based on the volume of interactions, the individuals in fact have a strong relationship. Further, in the case of sarcasm, examining only text data of words spoken by the individuals can cause misinterpretations of the speaker's intent. The methods described herein allow for audio data of sarcastic voice tones from the video data to provide context to the semantic text data. Further, the use of relationship graphs enables representation of individual interactions and/or of the overall connection between each pair of individuals of a group. Existing methods do not provide the granular modeling of relationships and/or connections between individuals of a group provided by the relationship graphs disclosed herein.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of method 600, which is a method of creating relationship graphs and of identifying anomalous edges in relationship graphs. Method 600 is performable by relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ) and includes steps 602-616 of acquiring video data (step 602), extracting image data (step 604), extracting audio data (step 606), extracting semantic text data (step 608), identifying a plurality of features (step 610), creating a relationship graph (step 612), inspecting the relationship graph to identify anomalous edges (step 614), and creating an output representative of the anomalous edge (step 616), and generating an adjustment recommendation (step 618). Method 600 can be stored to memory 104 of relationship evaluator 100 and executed by processor 102. For explanatory purposes, method 600 will generally be described herein with reference to relationship evaluator 100. However, method 600 can also be performed by any other suitable device or system.

In step 602, video data is acquired. The video data can be any media source having both audio and image components. The video data can be delivered to relationship evaluator 100 from a video source and/or relationship evaluator 100 can request the video data from the video source. The video source can be any suitable source of video, such as a multimedia file or a video stream. The video data can be of any length, but in some examples, the video data is sampled at pre-determined intervals for use with method 600. Method 600 can be performed for each segment of the video data and updated relationship graph data can be provided for each segment.

The video data acquired in step 602 is footage of an interacting event and includes footage of all individuals participating in the interacting event. The video data can be acquired by one or more cameras, where each camera captures video of at least one individual. The video data acquired in step 602 can be, for example, one or more of video data 110A-N and be taken by a single camera 108A-N or can be taken by multiple cameras 108A-N. Each camera can capture one or more individuals. In some examples, all individuals participating in the interacting event can be captured by a single camera (e.g., one of cameras 108A-N) and the video data captured by the camera can be used as the video data acquired in step 602. In other examples, all individuals participating in the interacting event can be captured by multiple cameras and the video data captured by those cameras can be compiled and/or aggregated from the video data acquired in step 602.

In step 604, image data is extracted from the video data acquired in step 602. The image data is stored to memory 104 as a series of still images for use with later steps of method 600. The image data can be extracted from the video data by processor 102 of relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ) with one or more programs of video processing module 120. The image data extracted in step 604 includes all individuals participating in the interacting event that were captured by in the image component of the video footage. In some examples, image data for each individual captured in the video data can be separated to create sets of image data for each individual. Features can be identified for each individual in subsequent step 610 by separately analyzing each set of image data. The image data can be separated by, for example, creating a cropped copy of the image data that only includes a single individual. Processor 102 can identify an individual from the still image data and crop each image of the still image data to include only that individual. Cropped image data sets can be created for each individual in the image data and can be separated analyzed for features in subsequent step 610. Additionally and/or alternatively, the image data can be stored as an unseparated file and features can be extracted in subsequent step 610 from the unseparated image data. The still image data can include one image for each frame of the video data or can be sampled at a pre-determined rate. For example, the video data can be sampled once every three frames to generate the still image data.

In step 606, audio data is extracted from the video data. The audio data is extracted by processor 102 of relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ) with one or more programs of video processing module 120 and can be stored to memory 104 for use with later steps of method 600. In some examples, the audio data for each individual can be separated to create sets of audio data for each individual captured in the video data. In some examples, processor 102 can execute one or more programs stored on memory 104 to identify which portions of the audio data in which an individual is communicating and trim the audio data to include only those portions. Trimming the audio data can reduce the file size of the audio data, which can reduce the computational requirements to perform steps 610, 612, and/or 614. The program can be, for example, a computer-implemented machine learning model trained to identify individuals based on voices present in audio data.

Processor 102 can use one or more programs stored to memory 104 to determine which portions of the audio correspond to each individual portrayed in the image data. Processor 102 (FIG. 1 ) can determine which portions of the audio correspond to each individual by, for example, inspecting metadata of the video data acquired in step 602. For example, if each camera 108A-N captures footage of only a single individual 112A-N, processor 102 can associate image and audio data extracted from video data captured by each camera 108A-N. Additionally and/or alternatively, processor 102 can execute one or more programs to identify individuals present in the image data and individuals present in the audio data. The processor 102 can cross-reference a library of individuals to determine which diarized or trimmed audio files and which portions of the image data correspond to each individual, and associate audio and image data for each individual. Additionally and/or alternatively, the processor 102 can execute one or more programs to analyze the image data and determine when each individual is talking. The processor 102 can then use that timestamp information to determine which portions of the audio file correspond to the each individual and thereby associate audio and image data for each individual.

In step 608, the first semantic text data is extracted. As referred to herein, “semantic text data” refers to data that represents spoken words, phrases, sentences, and other sounds produced by the first portrayed individual as readable text. The semantic text data can be, for example, a transcript of the words spoken in the audio portion of the video data. The semantic text data can be extracted from, for example, the audio data extracted in step 606. Processor 102 of relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ) can use one or more programs of video processing module 120 to extract the semantic text data. Semantic text data can be extracted from the audio data using a text-to-speech program or another suitable tool and can be associated to the audio and image data for the individual. Separated semantic text data can be extracted from separated audio data for each individual and associated with the appropriate individual. In other examples, the video data can include a semantic text transcript of words, phrases, sentences, etc. spoken by one or all individuals, and first semantic text data can be extracted directly from the video data. In these examples, the semantic text data can be correlated to the correct individual in the group by, for example, comparing timestamp information to the image and audio data, by comparing the semantic text data extracted from the video data to partial semantic text information derived from an extracted audio data set, or by another suitable method.

In step 610, a plurality of features is identified. Processor 102 can identify and extract features from one or more of the image data extracted in step 604, the audio data extracted in step 606, and the semantic text data extracted in step 608. The plurality of features includes classifiable features related to interactions that occurred during the interacting event and can be used to create a relationship graph in subsequent step 612. Processor 102 can inspect and identify features from one or more of the image data, the audio data, and the semantic text data extracted in steps 604, 606, and 608, respectively. The image data, audio data, semantic text data, or any combination thereof can be selected to create the plurality of features in step 610 based on application or operational need and/or based on use in generating relationship graphs that accurately depict interpersonal relationships. For example, if the group participating in the interacting event (i.e., the group of individuals depicted in the video data) is unlikely to be talking, the features identified in step 610 can include only features derived from the image data extracted in step 604. In other examples, features derivable from the audio data, semantic text data, or a combination of image, audio, and/or text data can be omitted from the plurality of features. Once features have been identified from the image data, the audio data, and/or the semantic text data, processor 102 can store the plurality of features to memory 104 for use with subsequent steps of method 600.

In some examples, one or more computer-implemented machine learning models can be used to extract the plurality of features. Each type of data extracted from the video data can be inspected using one or more software tools to identify features that can be stored as features of to the plurality of features. For example, a first computer-implemented machine learning model can be used to analyze image data and identify classifiable features, a second computer-implemented machine learning model can be used to analyze audio data and identify classifiable features, and a third computer-implemented machine learning model can be used to analyze semantic text data and identify classifiable features.

The image data can be analyzed using, for example, a computer vison model or another machine learning model to identify one or more body language elements that can be stored as features of the plurality of features. The body language elements can include, for example, one or more of hand gestures, head tilt, the presence and amount of eye contact, the amount of eye blinking, forehead wrinkling, mouth position, mouth shape, eyebrow shape, and/or eyebrow position. The audio data can be analyzed using, for example, one or more computer-implemented machine learning models to identify features related to information conveyance and/or interpersonal interactions. For example, the features identified from the audio data can be one or more of a vocal tone, a vocal cadence, a vocal pitch, the presence of vocal quavering, intonation, inflection, sentences stress, or another audio element indicative of information conveyance, mood, emotion, or another factor or element relevant to interpersonal communication. The semantic text data can be analyzed using, for example, a natural language understanding model or another machine learning model. The features can be, for example, phonemes, words, phrases, sentences, or other units of language that convey information and are stored in the semantic text data. The features can also be, for example, an intent and/or an entity in the semantic text data. A classifiable intent can include, for example, the intended meaning of a semantic text phrase. A classifiable entity can include, for example, words, phrases, sentences, or other units of language that provide additional context to further describe or classify an intent. In some examples, the model can compare the semantic text transcript of the first portrayed individual to a library of vectorized text data to determine the content of the semantic text data.

Each of the features extracted in step 610 is associated with one or more individuals of the individuals captured in the video data acquired in step 610. Associating the features extracted in step 610 allows for edges representative of those features to be associated with nodes representative of individuals captured in the video data, as will be explained in more detail with respect to subsequent step 612. Processor 102 can use one or more programs of feature extraction module 130 and/or graphing module 140, and/or one or more other programs stored to memory 104 to assign identities to individuals captured in the video data and to associate features with those identities. The identity information for each feature can be stored to memory 104 for use with subsequent steps of method 600.

In some examples, a feature may be directed such that it describes an interaction having a discernable initiator and/or recipient. Feature extraction module 130 can include one or more programs that allow for identification of whether a feature describes an interaction having an initiator and/or recipient and, in some examples, for identifying the initiator and/or recipient. Whether a feature has an initiator and/or recipient and the identities of the initiator and/or recipient can be stored to memory 104 for use with subsequent steps of method 600.

In step 612, a relationship graph is created. Processor 102 can use one or more programs of graphing module 140 to create the relationship graph. The relationship graph includes nodes representative of the individuals captured in the video data acquired in step 602 and edges representative of the features extracted in step 610 extending between those nodes. The number and identity of the nodes can be determined based on the identity information generated for the individuals captured in the video data. The connectivity and, in applicable examples, directions of edges can be determined based on the identities associated with each feature extracted by feature extraction module 130. In examples where the relationship graph is a weighted graph, edge weights can be assigned by one or more programs of graphing module 140 or another program stored to memory 104. For example, features extracted by feature extraction module 130 can be cross-referenced with a table, array, or database that relates features and edge weights, and the cross-referenced edge weights can be used as weights for the edges representative of those features in the relationship graph. Additionally and/or alternatively, edge weight can be determined using a computer-implemented machine learning model trained accept a feature identity as an input and to output an edge weight. In some examples, two or more edges between two nodes can be combined. For example, all edges between nodes can be combined into a single edge representative of the relationship between the two individuals represented by the nodes. As a further example, all edges of a particular category (e.g., all edges representative of body language-related features) can be combined into a single edge representative of that category. In these examples, the weights of the constituent edges can be combined, such as by summation, into a single value representative of the combined edge. Combining edges of the relationship graph can allow the edges to be representative of an overall connection between individuals of the group. In some examples, it may be advantageous for certain individuals to have little or no connection, and the presence of any edge between the nodes representing those individuals can be identified quickly in subsequent step 614 where the edges of the relationship graph have been combined in this manner. In further examples, the relationship graph can be plotted and a plotted depiction of the relationship graph can be stored as an image to memory 104.

In step 614, the relationship graph is analyzed to identify anomalous edges. As described previously, an anomalous edge is an edge that is not expected within the relationship graph based on historical relationship graph information. Processor 102 can use one or more programs of anomalous edge identification module 150 (FIG. 1 ) to identify the anomalous edge. Step 614 can be performed by, for example, comparing the relationship graph generated in step 612 to a set of historical relationship graphs. Edges not present or present at a frequency below a particular threshold in the historical data can be recognized as anomalous edges if present in the relationship graph generated in step 612. In other examples, a machine learning algorithm can be trained to identify anomalous edges by using the historical relationship graph data as training data. The training data can be labeled for supervised learning or remain unlabeled for unsupervised learning. The historical data can describe interactions of only the members of the group represented in the relationship graph generated in step 614 or the historical data can include interactions of various groups of individuals. Advantageously, training a machine learning model with data specific to the group evaluated using method 600 can increase the accuracy of anomalous edge creation. Using data that is not specific to a particular group of individuals advantageously allows for the identification of anomalous edges for a group of individuals for which historical relationship data is not available or does not exist. In yet further examples, a machine learning model can be trained to identify anomalous edges using a manually generated training set made without reference to historical data. Rather, the training set can be created to reflect an ideal or otherwise pre-selected set of relationships among members of the group. In all examples using a trained machine learning model, the training data and the relationship graph created in step 612 can be transformed in any suitable way for use as inputs to a machine learning model.

In some examples, the relationship graph generated in step 612 can be converted to an image hash prior to anomalous edge identification by the program(s) of anomalous edge identification module 150. In these examples, anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more programs for creating an image of the relationship graph generated in step 612, for creating an image hash of the relationship graph image, and for identifying anomalous edges based on image hash data. In other examples, anomalous edge identification module 150 can be configured to identify anomalous edges based on relationship data stored as a table, array, and/or database. In these examples, anomalous edge identification module 150 can include one or more programs for storing relationship graph information as a table, array, and/or database.

In step 616, an output representative of each identified anomalous edge is created. Processor 102 can create the output representative of the anomalous edge using one or more programs of memory 104, such as one or more programs of anomalous edge identification module 150. The output can include one or more alphanumeric characters representative of edges identified as anomalous edges in step 614. For example, the output can be an indication of individual(s) associated with the edges, or action(s) or feature(s) represented by the edges. As described previously, anomalous edges can contribute positively or negatively to interacting events based on the context of the interaction represented by the edge. For example, additional interactions may lead to greater teamwork in some contexts (e.g., where the interacting event is collaborative in nature), but in other contexts the additional interactions may represent distractions or a general lack of team focus that contributes to negatively to team productivity. Advantageously, providing outputs that describe both the actions(s) or feature(s) and the individual(s) associated with the edges can improve the ability of the members of the group or another individual to diagnose the cause of the anomalous edge and to determine whether the edge contributes positively or negatively to the outcome of the interacting event. One or more individuals of the group or an individual in a managerial position relative to the group can use the output to determine whether anomalous edge represents a positive or negative development in interpersonal relations among the group. The indication of the anomalous edge can be output as alphanumeric characters representing the individual and/or the action(s) or feature(s) associated with the edge. The output created in step 616 can be output by a user interface, such as user interface 106 of relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ), to one or more members of the group or to an individual in a managerial role relative to the group.

In step 618, an adjustment recommendation is output. Step 618 is optional and is only performed in examples where the presence of an anomalous edge in the relationship graph generated in step 612 is associated with a negative outcome of the interacting event. The adjustment recommendation is selected to reduce the likelihood that the anomalous edge appears in subsequent relationship graphs of subsequent interacting events and includes one or more actions that can be performed by a member of the group or an individual in a managerial role relative to the group. For example, the adjustment recommendation can be an instruction to one of the individuals connected by the anomalous edge to perform or refrain from performing one or more actions and/or an instruction to another member of a group including the individuals connected by the anomalous edge to disrupt the interaction represented by the anomalous edge. Additionally and/or alternatively, the adjustment recommendation can be an instruction to an individual in a managerial role to take one or more actions to members of the group before a subsequent interacting event, such as talking to, counseling, or providing another intervention to the individuals connected by the anomalous edge.

Memory 104 can store a table, array, and/or database that associates adjustment recommendations with features and/or action represented by edges, and processor 102 can cross-reference the table, array, and/or database to determine an adjustment recommendation associated with reducing the likelihood that the anomalous edge appears on a subsequent graph of a subsequent interacting event between the members of the group. In other examples, the adjustment recommendation can be generated using one or more machine learning models trained to associate edges of a relationship graph with adjustment recommendations for causing those edges to be absent from a subsequent relationship graph of a subsequent interacting event. Anomalous edges identified in step 614 can be used as inputs for the machine learning model(s) to generate the adjustment recommendation. The adjustment recommendation can be output by a user interface, such as user interface 106 of relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ).

In some examples, the audio data extracted in step 602 can be converted to an audio spectrogram and that can be analyzed in step 610 to identify the plurality of features. FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of method 650, which is a method of analyzing audio data that can be performed during steps 604 and/or 610 of method 600. Method 600 includes steps 652-654 of generating an audio spectrogram (step 652) and analyzing the audio spectrogram to identify features (step 654).

In step 652, the audio data extracted in step 606 is converted to a spectrogram. The spectrogram can describe, for example, the amplitude or frequency ranges of the audio data. In step 654, features present in the audio spectrogram are identified. The features identified in step 654 are features related to information conveyance and/or interpersonal interactions, as described previously with respect to step 610 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ). In some examples, processing the audio data as an audio spectrogram reduces the computational load required for a processor and/or control circuitry (e.g., processor 102 of relationship evaluator 100) to identify features in the audio data.

The anomalous edges identified by method 600 can be used to better understand and improve relationships among a group of individuals that repeatedly interacts. Advantageously, method 600 can be performed in an automatic manner by a suitable computer system, such as relationship evaluator 100 (FIG. 1 ), based only on video data of the individuals of the group interacting. As such, method 600 allows for potentially negative interactions that could reduce the overall strength of the relationship between two or more group members in an automated way during or immediately subsequent to the event in which the interactions occurred. Advantageously, this allows the outputs of method 600 to be acted upon before subsequent interactions, potentially mitigating further strain on the relationship between the group members connected by the anomalous edge. The outputs created by method 600 can be used by members of the group to diagnose strain in their own interpersonal relationships and take proactive steps (e.g., a recommendation produced in step 618 of method 600) to reduce strain and conflict among members of the group. Method 600 also allows for individuals in managerial position or other positions of authority to better understand relationships among the individuals they are managing and take steps to reduce strain and conflict between individuals connected by an anomalous edge.

Notably, reducing conflicts among groups of individuals can significantly improve overall group productivity. A high degree of conflict between two or more individuals can reduce productivity of and collaboration between the individuals having a strained relationship and can also significantly decrease productivity and collaboration among other members of the group by contributing to, for example, a hostile or unfriendly work environment. Accordingly, the automated system for quickly diagnosing and correcting conflicts and difficulties among a group provided by method 600 can be used to improve or maintain group productivity at a high level.

Further, as method 600 is performed automatically using a computer system (e.g., relationship evaluator 100) and video data, method 600 does not require significant human judgment or expertise to evaluate relationships and identify potentially problematic interactions. Accordingly, method 600 can be used by individuals having little or no expertise at understanding body language, social dynamics, or other aspects of human interaction to diagnose and improve relationships among groups they participate in and/or manage, among other options.

The anomalous edges generated by method 600 can also be used by individuals in managerial roles to more easily evaluate relationship strength and take steps to improve relationship quality among a work team without having to directly observe interactions among members of the work team. Accordingly, method 600 enables evaluation of the strength of relationships in situations where it is not practical or possible for one individual to observe all interactions among the group and identify potentially problematic interactions or otherwise evaluate interpersonal relationships. In the same way, method 600 can improve the ability of individuals with sensory impairments to manage a team of individuals by improving their ability to evaluate and improve relationships among the team.

FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of method 700, which is a method of identifying anomalous edges from tabulated relationship graph data. Method 700 includes steps 702-706 of converting the current relationship graph to tabulated data (step 702), converting historical relationship graphs to tabulated data (step 704), and identifying an anomalous edge based on the tabulated data (step 706). Method 700 can be performed to identify anomalous edges during step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ).

In steps 702 and step 704, the current and historical relationship graphs, respectively, are converted to tabulated data representative of those relationship graphs. The current relationship graph is a relationship graph generated in step 612 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ) and the historical relationship graphs are graphs of interacting events that occurred prior to the interacting event captured in the video data acquired in step 602 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ). Steps 702 and 704 can be performed in substantially the same way to create tabulated data. The tabulated data can include, for example, one or more tables, arrays, and/or databases representative of the relationship graph data. The format of the tabular relationship graph data is selected to enable anomalous edge identification. Step 702 can be performed at any point before step 706. Step 704 is performed after step 612 of method 600 and before step 706.

In step 706, anomalous edges in the current relationship graph are identified based on the tabulated data produced in steps 602 and 604. Step 706 can be performed as discussed previously with respect to step 614. For example, step 706 can be performed using one or more computer-implemented machine learning models trained to identify anomalous edges based on tabulated relationship graph information. In these examples, the computer-implemented machine learning models can be trained to identify anomalous edges in a current relationship graph by comparing the edges of the current relationship graph with the edges of the historical relationship graphs. In other examples, the tabulated data of the historical relationship graphs can be used to train the computer-implemented machine learning model(s) to identify anomalous edges in tabulated graph data. In these examples, the computer-implemented machine learning models can be trained at any point prior to step 706. Step 706 can be performed in addition to or in place of other methods of anomalous edge identification in step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ).

FIG. 9 is a flow diagram of method 750, which is a method of identifying anomalous edges from image hash data of relationship graphs. Method 750 includes steps 752-756 of creating images of the current and historical relationship graphs (step 752), creating images hashes from the images of the current and historical relationship graphs (step 754), and identifying an anomalous edge based on the image hash data (step 706). Method 750 is similar to method 700 but uses image hash data rather than tabulated data. Like method 700, method 750 can be performed to identify anomalous edges during step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ).

In step 752, images of the current and historical relationship graphs are created. The images can be created by plotting the current and historical relationship graphs and storing those plotted depictions as image files. The image files for each graph of the current and historical relationship graphs are plotted in substantially the same way (e.g., arrangement of nodes, position of nodes, etc.) and have substantially similar file characteristics (e.g., image size, image resolution, etc.), such that image hashes of the image files can be compared to give accurate predictions about anomalous edges in step 756.

In step 754, the images created in step 752 are hashed to create hashed image files. The images can be hashed in any suitable manner. Advantageously, hashing the image files can substantially decrease the computational cost associated with anomalous edge identification in subsequent step 756.

In step 756, anomalous edges in the current relationship graph are identified based on the hashed image data produced in step 754. Step 756 can be performed as discussed previously with respect to steps 614 and 706. For example, step 756 can be performed using one or more computer-implemented machine learning models trained to identify anomalous edges based on hashed data of images of relationship graphs. In these examples, the computer-implemented machine learning models can be trained to identify anomalous edges in a current relationship graph by comparing hashed data of the current graph with the hashed data of the historical relationship graphs. In other examples, the hashed data of the historical relationship graphs can be used to train the computer-implemented machine learning model(s) to identify anomalous edges in hashed image data of relationship graphs. Step 756 can be performed in addition to or in place of other methods of anomalous edge identification in step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ).

FIG. 10 is a flow diagram of method 800, which is a method of generating historical relationship graphs for use in step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ). Method 800 includes steps 802-808 of acquiring video data of a historical interacting event (step 802), extracting image, audio, and semantic text data (step 804), analyzing the image, audio, and/or semantic text data to identify features (step 806), and creating a historical relationship graph (step 808). The steps of method 800 are similar to steps of method 600, but are performed using historical video data. The historical video data used in method 800 is video data of interacting events that occurred prior to the interacting event captured in the video data acquired in step 602 and, accordingly, can be used to identify anomalous edges in step 614 of method 600. More specifically, step 802 can be performed in substantially the same way as step 602, step 804 can be performed in substantially the same way as steps 604-608, step 806 can be performed in substantially the same way as step 610, and step 808 can be performed in substantially the same way as step 612.

Method 800 can be repeated for several historical interacting events, where each event includes one or more interactions, to increase the size of the dataset used to determine anomalous edges in step 614 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ). Advantageously, the use of larger datasets can significantly increase the accuracy of anomalous edge identification in step 612 of method 600 (FIG. 6 ). In some examples, the historical events captured in the video data used to generate relationship graphs by method 800 includes the same individuals as the interacting event captured in the video data used in method 600. Advantageously, this can also increase the accuracy of predictions about anomalous edges made using method 600. In other examples, the historical events captured in the video data used by method 800 can include other individuals and/or other quantities of individuals. Advantageously, this can allow for anomalous edges to be identified among groups lacking historical data, such as meetings or group tasks where the composition of the group can change over iterations of the interacting event.

FIG. 11 is a flow diagram of method 950, which is a method of supervised training of a computer-implemented machine learning model for use with other methods of this disclosure. Method 950 includes steps 952-956 of generating labeled training data (step 952), training the computer-implemented machine learning model with the labeled data (step 954), and testing the trained computer-implemented machine learning model with test data (step 956). Method 950 can be used to train any machine learning model described herein (e.g., for a machine learning model for identifying and extracting features, for a machine learning model for creating relationship graphs, for a machine learning model for identifying anomalous edges, etc.) but will be discussed with respect to a generic machine learning model for explanatory purposes.

In step 952, labeled data is generated. The labeled data can be generated by tagging a data with one or more labels describing the data. For example, where the labeled data is a set of relationship graphs, each relationship graph can be tagged with a label describing the outcome of the interacting event described by the relationship graph. The labeled data can be, for example, labeled video data. The labeled data can also be, for example, audio data, image data, semantic text data, or labeled outputs of another trained machine learning model. The labeled data can be one or more features used to create a relationship graph via, for example, method 600. The labeled data can also be, for example, one or more relationship graphs.

In step 954, the labeled data is used to train the computer-implemented machine learning model. As used herein, “training” a computer-implemented machine learning model refers to any process by which parameters, hyper parameters, weights, and/or any other value related model accuracy are adjusted to improve the fit of the computer-implemented machine learning model to the training data. The labeled data can be transformed by, for example, one or more programs and/or one or more other trained machine learning models before it is used for training in step 954.

In step 956, the trained computer-implemented machine learning model is tested with test data. The test data used in step 956 is unlabeled data that is used to qualify and/or quantify performance of the trained computer-implemented machine learning model. More specifically, a human or machine operator can evaluate the performance of the machine learning model by evaluating the fit of the model to the test data. Step 956 can be used to determine, for example, whether the machine learning model was overfit to the labeled data during model training in step 954.

As depicted in FIG. 11 , steps 954 and 956 can be performed iteratively to improve the performance of the machine learning model. More specifically, if the fit of the model to the unlabeled data determined in step 956 is undesirable, step 954 can be repeated to further adjust the parameters, hyper parameters, weights, etc. of the model to improve the fit of the model to the test data. Step 956 can then be repeated with a new set of unlabeled test data to determine how the adjusted model fits the new set of unlabeled test data. If the fit continues to be undesirable, further iterations of steps 954 and 956 can be performed until the fit of the model becomes desirable.

FIG. 12 is a flow diagram of method 960, which is a method of unsupervised training of a computer-implemented machine learning algorithm. Method includes steps 962-966 of generating unlabeled training data (step 962), training the computer-implemented machine learning model with the labeled data (step 964), and testing the trained computer-implemented machine learning model with test data (step 966). Method 960 is substantially similar to method 950, discussed previously, but can be used for training where the computer-implemented machine learning model is, for example, an artificial neural network or a one-class support-vector machine model.

Steps 962, 964, and 966 are substantially similar to steps 952, 954, and 956 of method 950 FIG. 11 ), but are performed using unlabeled data. Accordingly, method 960 can be used to train a machine learning model for outlier detection using a set of historical relationship graphs as a training set for the computer-implemented machine learning model. Conversely, method 950 is appropriate for training a machine learning model using a set of relationship graphs labeled as including outliers or not including outliers. Similarly, method 950 can be used to train machine learning models for outlier detection using relationship graphs having individual edges labeled as outliers. Labeled historical relationship graphs or manually-generated and artificial relationship graphs reflecting ideal interactions can be used to train a machine learning model using method 950.

As described previously, the methods and systems disclosed herein provide significant advantages for identifying unexpected interactions among a group of individuals and, where those interactions are associated with negative outcomes, taking steps to reduce or eliminate the likelihood that those interactions occur during subsequent interacting events. Advantageously, the methods and systems described herein allow for unexpected interactions to be identified based only on video data and can be performed in an automated manner by one or more computer systems (e.g., relationship evaluator 100), thereby providing a more objective method of evaluating interpersonal relationships than conventional methods that rely on subjective judgment. Notably, the methods and systems described herein also allow for the automatic generation of recommendations for improving relationships and reducing the likelihood that an anomalous interaction occurs during a subsequent interacting event, also reducing the expertise in social interactions required to remedy strained interpersonal relationships.

While the invention has been described with reference to an exemplary embodiment(s), it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made, and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment(s) disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the present disclosure. 

1. A method comprising: acquiring digital video data that portrays an interacting event, the interacting event comprising a plurality of interactions between a plurality of individuals; analyzing, by a first computer-implemented machine learning model, the digital video data to identify a plurality of features, wherein: each feature of the plurality of features corresponds to an interaction of the plurality of interactions; and each feature of the plurality of features is associated with at least one individual of the plurality of individuals; analyzing the plurality of features to create a relationship graph, wherein: the relationship graph comprises a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges; each node of the plurality of nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals; each edge of the plurality of edges extends between two nodes of the plurality of nodes; and the plurality of edges represents the plurality of interactions; identifying, by a second computer-implemented machine learning model, an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge, wherein the second computer-implemented machine learning model is configured to identify anomalous edges in relationship graphs; creating an output representative of the anomalous edge; and outputting, by a user interface, the output representative of the anomalous edge.
 2. The method of claim 1, and further comprising before identifying an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge: acquiring historical video data that portrays a plurality of historical events, wherein each historical event occurred of the plurality of historical events occurred prior to the interacting event; creating a plurality of historical graphs based on the historical video data, by for each historical event of the plurality of historical events: extracting historical image data, historical audio data, and historical text data from the historical video data; analyzing, by the first computer-implemented machine learning model, at least one of the historical image data, the historical audio data, and the historical semantic text data to identify a plurality of historical features; and analyzing the plurality of historical features to create a historical graph; wherein each historical graph includes a plurality of historical nodes and a plurality of historical edges extending between nodes of the plurality of historical nodes; training the second machine learning model to identify anomalous edges based on the plurality of historical graphs, wherein anomalous edges are edges that are not present in the plurality of historical graphs.
 3. The method of claim 2, and further comprising outputting an adjustment recommendation for improving a subsequent outcome of a subsequent interacting event.
 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the adjustment recommendation comprises instructions for performing an action that, when performed, is associated with causing the anomalous edge to be absent from a subsequent relationship graph of the subsequent interacting event.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the output representative of the anomalous edge comprises a description of the feature of the plurality of features represented by the anomalous edge.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the description of the feature of the plurality of features comprises a description of a first individual of the plurality of individuals associated with the feature and a description of a second individual of the plurality of individuals associated with the feature.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the description of the feature of the plurality of features comprises a description of an interaction of the plurality of interactions that corresponds to the feature.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein identifying, by the second computer-implemented machine learning model, the edge of the plurality of edges as the anomalous edge comprises: creating an image of the relationship graph; creating a hash of the relationship graph image; creating images of the plurality of historical relationship graphs; and creating hashes of the plurality of historical relationship graphs; wherein the second computer-implemented machine learning model is configured to compare the hash of the relationship graph image to the hashes of the plurality of historical relationship graphs to identify the anomalous edge.
 9. The method of claim 8, wherein identifying, by the second computer-implemented machine learning model, the edge of the plurality of edges as the anomalous edge comprises: converting the relationship graph to tabulated data; and converting the plurality of historical relationship graphs to a historical set of tabulated data; wherein the second computer-implemented machine learning model is configured to compare the tabulated data to the historical set of tabulated data to identify the anomalous edge.
 10. The method of claim 7, wherein each historical event of the plurality of historical events comprises a plurality of historical interactions between the plurality of individuals, such that, for each historical relationship graph of the plurality of historical relationship graphs, each historical node of the plurality of historical nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals.
 11. The method of claim 10, wherein training the second machine learning model to identify anomalous edges based on the plurality of historical graphs comprises: labeling each historical graph of the plurality of historical groups as to create a first set of labeled relationship graphs and a second set of labeled relationship graphs, wherein: the relationship graphs of the first set of labeled relationship graphs do not include anomalous edges; and each relationship graph of the second set of labeled relationship graphs includes an anomalous edge; and training the second machine learning model to identify anomalous edges with the first set of labeled relationship graphs and the second set of labeled relationship graphs.
 12. The method of claim 11, wherein analyzing the plurality of features to create the relationship graph comprises analyzing the plurality of features with a third computer-implemented machine learning model to create the relationship graph.
 13. The method of claim 12, and further comprising: extracting image data from the digital video data; extracting audio data from the digital video data; extracting semantic text data from the digital video data; analyzing the image data with the first computer-implemented machine learning model; analyzing the audio data with a fourth computer-implemented machine learning model; and analyzing the semantic text data with a fifth computer-implemented machine learning model.
 14. The method of claim 13, and further comprising: training the second computer-implemented machine learning model with a training set of relationship graphs, the training set of relationship graphs including a first set of labeled relationship graphs and a second set of labeled relationship graphs, wherein: the relationship graphs of the first set of labeled relationship graphs do not include anomalous edges; and each relationship graph of the second set of labeled relationship graphs includes an anomalous edge.
 15. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying, by the second computer-implemented machine learning model, an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge comprises comparing, by the second computer-implemented machine learning model, the plurality of edges to historical edges of a plurality of historical relationship graphs.
 16. A system comprising: a camera device for acquiring digital video data; a processor; a user interface; and a memory encoded with instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to: acquire digital video data from the camera, wherein the digital video data portrays an interacting event comprising a plurality of interactions a plurality of individuals; extract image data, audio data, and semantic text data from the digital video data; analyze, by a first computer-implemented machine learning model, at least one of the image data, the audio data, and the semantic text data to identify a plurality of features in the digital video data, wherein: each feature of the plurality of features corresponds to an interaction of the plurality of interactions; and each feature of the plurality of features is associated with at least one individual of the plurality of individuals; analyze the plurality of features to create a relationship graph, wherein: the relationship graph comprises a plurality of nodes and a plurality of edges each node of the plurality of nodes represents an individual of the plurality of individuals; each edge of the plurality of edges extends between two nodes of the plurality of nodes; and the plurality of edges represents the plurality of interactions; identify, by a second computer-implemented machine learning model, an edge of the plurality of edges as an anomalous edge, wherein the first second computer-implemented machine learning model is configured to identify anomalous edges in relationship graphs; create an output representative of the anomalous edge; and output, by the user interface, the output representative of the anomalous edge.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein the second computer-implemented machine learning model is trained with a plurality of historical graphs to identify anomalous edges, wherein each historical graph of the plurality of historical graphs comprises: the plurality of nodes; and a plurality of historical edges extending between the plurality of nodes, wherein the plurality of historical edges represents the plurality of historical interactions of a historical event represented by the historical relationship graph; wherein the historical event occurred prior to the interacting event.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the output representative of the anomalous edge comprises a description of the feature of the plurality of features represented by the anomalous edge.
 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the description of the feature of the plurality of features comprises: a description of an individual of the plurality of individuals associated with the feature; and a description of an interaction of the plurality of interactions that corresponds to the feature.
 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the processor to output an adjustment recommendation for improving a subsequent outcome of a subsequent interacting event, wherein the adjustment recommendation comprises instructions for performing an action that, when performed, is associated with causing the key feature to be absent from a subsequent relationship graph of the subsequent interacting event. 